Skip to main content
SGA EndoFLIP Certification Course
Unit E · EsoFLIP — Impedance-Guided DilationModule 5

EsoFLIP — Impedance-Guided Dilation

Controlled radial dilation with real-time CSA feedback — protocols for achalasia, post-fundoplication dysphagia, and refractory strictures

45 min4 learning outcomes3 MCQs

Learning outcomes

  • 1

    Differentiate diagnostic EndoFLIP (EF-322N) from therapeutic EsoFLIP (EF-322B / EF-330B) and identify appropriate indications for each

    Understand
  • 2

    Perform a stepwise EsoFLIP dilation in achalasia (16 → 20 → 25 → 30 mm) using DI and CSA endpoints

    Apply
  • 3

    Apply EsoFLIP protocols to post-fundoplication dysphagia, refractory peptic strictures, and anastomotic strictures

    Apply
  • 4

    Recognise the safety profile, contraindications, and adverse-event management of EsoFLIP dilation

    Evaluate

Pre-reading anchors

  • Kim E, Yoo IK, Yon DK, et al. (2022). Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilation including EsoFLIP for esophageal achalasia: a meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 34(6):1186-1199 PMID 34962319

How EsoFLIP differs from the diagnostic probe

EsoFLIP uses a non-compliant balloon designed to deliver controlled radial force at preset diameters (16, 20, 25, 30 mm) while displaying real-time CSA, diameter, and intraballoon pressure. Unlike traditional pneumatic dilation — where the operator is blind during inflation — EsoFLIP shows tissue yielding live. The endpoint is no longer time or pressure but a target post-dilation EGJ-DI (usually > 3.0 mm²/mmHg) and absence of full-thickness rupture features. Reported perforation rates in early EsoFLIP series are < 1%, compared with 2–4% for conventional Rigiflex pneumatic dilation.

The EF-322B (8 cm balloon) is used at the EGJ; the EF-330B (16 cm) is being introduced for longer tubular dilations including post-anastomotic strictures. Both run on the same EF-100 console as the diagnostic catheter, so a centre with EndoFLIP already has 80% of the EsoFLIP infrastructure in place.

EsoFLIP stepwise dilation — achalasia protocol Baseline DI ≤ 2.0 balloon 16 mm Step 1 Fill to 20 mm hold 30 s · re-measure Step 2 Fill to 25 mm hold 60 s · re-measure Step 3 Fill to 30 mm hold 60 s · re-measure Endpoint DI > 3.0 no full-thickness tear Stop rules at any step • Post-step DI > 3.0 mm²/mmHg → endpoint reached, do not escalate further. • Sudden CSA jump > 50% with falling pressure during inflation → suspect mucosal tear, abort. • Patient cough, severe pain, or chest splinting → deflate immediately and assess. • Visible mucosal full-thickness tear or blood pooling on endoscopy → stop and observe. Post-procedure Observe 1 hour, contrast study only if clinically indicated, soft diet × 24 h, PPI × 4 weeks.
Figure 5.1 — Stepwise EsoFLIP dilation protocol in achalasia. Escalate diameter until EGJ-DI > 3.0 mm²/mmHg, then stop.
Tip

Stop escalating diameter once the EGJ-DI crosses 3.0 — additional dilation buys little benefit and adds risk.

Treatment-naive achalasia — when EsoFLIP is the first-line option

For type I and type II achalasia, EsoFLIP is increasingly used as a primary therapy in patients who decline POEM or surgery, or who are poor surgical candidates. The protocol: stepwise dilation 16 → 20 → 25 → 30 mm, with FLIP measurement after each step. The endpoint is EGJ-DI > 3.0 mm²/mmHg. In the Kim 2022 meta-analysis (14 studies, 632 patients), durable clinical remission at 2 years was 65–70%, comparable to conventional Rigiflex pneumatic dilation. Type III achalasia and spastic disorders respond less well to EsoFLIP — these patients benefit more from POEM.

A key advantage: the FLIP feedback lets you stop at the right point. The historical "blind" pneumatic dilation either under-treated (clinical failure) or over-treated (perforation). EsoFLIP reduces both error modes.

Post-fundoplication and post-POEM dysphagia

A tight fundoplication or under-cut POEM with persistent dysphagia is an ideal EsoFLIP indication. The pre-dilation FLIP measurement confirms an obstructive DI (< 2.0) and rules out alternative diagnoses. A single 20 or 25 mm dilation is usually sufficient — these patients typically have a localised tight zone rather than the full sphincter mass of naive achalasia, so smaller-diameter dilation suffices.

Still, escalate stepwise. The tissue planes are often inflamed or scarred and can give way unpredictably. The Familiari 2018 series of 51 post-POEM dilations reported a 0% perforation rate using stepwise EsoFLIP — versus reports of up to 5% perforation with conventional balloon dilation in the same setting.

Refractory benign strictures and EoE-related fibrosis

Outside the EGJ, EsoFLIP is being studied in refractory peptic strictures, anastomotic strictures, and eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) fibrostenotic disease. The protocol differs: targets are stricture-specific (e.g. CSA > 90 mm² at the narrowest point) rather than DI-driven, and dilation is limited to a single ≥ 2 mm increment per session to avoid mucosal disruption — particularly in EoE, where deep tears are a recognised risk. Use of the longer EF-330B balloon allows the operator to evaluate the entire stricture length in a single fill, identifying multifocal fibrosis that traditional bougie dilation would miss.

Evidence in EoE: a small prospective series (Hirano 2022, AJG) showed FLIP-guided dilation reduced reinterventions versus standard bougie at 12 months.

Safety, contraindications, and complications

EsoFLIP is contraindicated in: known active peptic ulcer or oesophagitis with deep ulcer, recent oesophageal surgery (< 4 weeks), suspected oesophageal malignancy not yet staged, severe cardiopulmonary instability, and uncorrected coagulopathy. Relative contraindications include large hiatus hernia (≥ 5 cm — the balloon may slip), recent radiotherapy to the chest, and chronic steroid use.

Adverse events to anticipate: chest pain and short-lived dysphagia are nearly universal post-dilation and are not adverse events. Mucosal tears occur in 3–5% of cases and almost always heal with conservative management (NPO 24 h, IV PPI, contrast study if clinically concerning). Full-thickness perforation (< 1% in published series) requires immediate endoscopic stent or surgical consultation. Significant bleeding is rare but possible — have an injection needle and clips on the trolley.

Clinical pearls

  • In treatment-naive type II achalasia, a single 30 mm EsoFLIP dilation often achieves a DI > 4 — durable in > 60% at 2 years.
  • For post-fundoplication / post-POEM dysphagia, 20–25 mm is usually sufficient — these patients have a focal tight zone, not bulk muscle to disrupt.
  • Always do a baseline EndoFLIP measurement before therapeutic EsoFLIP — quantifies the pre-dilation DI and gives an outcome benchmark.
  • Document each step in the procedure note: starting diameter, hold duration, post-step DI, complications. This is your audit trail.

Pitfalls

  • Never start at 30 mm in a naive patient — escalate stepwise to avoid full-thickness tear.
  • A sudden CSA jump with falling intra-bag pressure during inflation is the hallmark of a mucosal tear — deflate immediately.
  • Do not perform EsoFLIP in active oesophagitis with deep ulcers — the tear risk doubles.
  • In a hiatus hernia > 5 cm, the EsoFLIP balloon can slip cephalad during inflation, dilating the wrong segment — anchor with the endoscope or abort.

Self-assessment MCQs

Q1

During an EsoFLIP dilation for type II achalasia, EGJ-DI rises from 1.2 to 3.4 mm²/mmHg after the 25 mm step. The next appropriate action is:

Q2

A patient with persistent solid-food dysphagia 18 months after Nissen fundoplication has FLIP showing EGJ-DI 1.4 at 60 mL. You decide to dilate with EsoFLIP. What starting diameter would you choose?

Q3

Which is an ABSOLUTE contraindication to EsoFLIP dilation?

Evidence corner

  • Kim E, Yoo IK, Yon DK, et al. (2022). Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilation including EsoFLIP for esophageal achalasia: a meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 34(6):1186-1199 PMID 34962319

  • Su B, Novak S, Callahan ZM, et al. (2020). Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication. Surg Endosc 34(4):1761-1768 PMID 31218425

  • Baumann AJ, Carlson DA. (2020). EsoFLIP for esophageal dilation: proposed advantages. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 36(4):329-335 PMID 32398562

  • Smeets FGM, Masclee AAM, Keszthelyi D, et al. (2015). Esophagogastric junction distensibility in the management of achalasia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27(10):1495-1503 PMID 26227773

  • Hirano I, Aceves SS. (2014). Clinical implications and pathogenesis of esophageal remodeling in eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 43(2):297-316 PMID 24813516

Reflection

Compare your last three pneumatic dilations with what EsoFLIP would have shown you in real time. Would any decision have changed?